Character of the Week #13 Voting Group C

 Topic: Character of the Week #13 Voting Group C
Users reading this topic: There are no members reading this topic.
  Posted on March 29, 2013 13:20
Rank: member

Forum Rank:
Special Jounin

Posts: 525
Joined on:
December 27, 2012
Welcome to the first Week trial of Character of the Year. The point of this contest. The purpose of this contest is to decide who has made the best character within a Year of work, by requiring criticisms for our fellow Naruto-Boards members, and of course improve ourselves in character making and have fun. This is a voting topic so all you have to do is vote... respecting the rules of course.

Banned from voting:

Read the voting rules! It's very easy to break a rule unwillingly!

Voting Rules and Mode of Voting:
Your votes must mention something about each character. (Eg: I like how character x deals a lot of damage and how character y has great defensive...)
You must specify why you consider the character you vote better than the other two character(s). (Eg: I consider that character x is better, because unlike the other characters, he deals an average amount of damage with simple costs, keeping up with his flow, but the other two have messy high amount of damage that are just an excuse to make the character original)
Your decision may not be based solely on pictures. (Eg of what you should not do:
#3 character has better pictures than the other two. Their pictures are LQ and lame. #3 is for me)
If you mention something about the balance of a character, you must exemplify why you consider that character.(Eg: First character is much better than the second because he is balanced. Unlike 2nd character that can go invulnerable for 5 turns in a row, this character is simply awesome, he just deals the right amount of damage and has the right amount of defense.)
If you mention something about the flow of a character, you must exemplify the flow of the character.(Eg: I prefer first character's flow because you can use 1st and 2nd skill in order to create a gigantic amount of defense and then use 3rd skill in order to succesfully stun the opponent for a great amount of turns. Anyway, 2nd character lacks any kind of flow, which I dislike. All that character's skill are randomly thought effects)
Originality may not be used as a reason to vote, but it can still be mentioned in votes. (Eg of what to not do: This character is original. VOTE VOTE VOTE #3 VOTE!!
Oversimplified/Overcomplicated character may be used as a reason, as long as you explain why the character is too complicated or too simple. (Eg: First character is too simple, because it only has simple and plain effects, while the second character is too complicated, because it has too many effects that are placed there randomly)
The design of the template does not count if that's the sole reason you vote for one character. The pictures will also count in this category, if mentioned, so they won't count as something else if mentioned in the vote.
•If a character is chakra heavy and you consider it a bad thing, you must explain how it influences the character badly, according to the character's skills. (Eg: This character's offensive skills are way too costly and they shouldn't cost that much, because the chakra type for them is really hard to gain. It will take hours to even cast a skill of theirs. Their defensive skill doesn't really help much, since he's solely based on offensive, which mostly cannot be used.)
•You may only vote for one character.
•You may not vote for yourself, unless the group contains only your character. You won't need to give any reasonings if they are your characters.
•You may not empty quote or copy any of the votes already given or say in your vote, I agree with person x.
•You may not vote if your post count is under 500 posts.
•You may not vote if your account is not two months old.

~Now that everything has been said:~\\

Character #1

Character #2

Character #3

Character #4
  Posted on March 29, 2013 13:36
Rank: member

Forum Rank:

Posts: 1273
Joined on:
May 30, 2012
Number 1 on this one.
  Posted on March 29, 2013 17:24
Rank: member

Forum Rank:

Posts: 7482
Joined on:
July 19, 2007
A DD concept I actually like.
I just think the third skill is out of place because I would never use it.
Use first skill.
Use 2nd every time I get the chance. Use 4th skill whenever I don't get the chance.
Build up that DD and be invinsible.
Actually a pretty solid character.
But like I said, I wouldn't use the third skill.

Pretty cool.
Focusing around meteor points that you can et from aall of the skills.
I beleive he is balance-perfect.
Being a slow character that uuses stacks (honestly my favorite) the balance evens out with everything.
Best Jellel I've read so far and honestly nothing left to sayabout it.

Not a solid concept.
Each skill seems independant and OP or UP in their own way.
1st skill has too high of cooldown/cost ratio.
Not worth it to be -possibly- spared 1 turn of damage.
2nd skill seems useless if the enemy doesn't use a skill thatndeals effects. If it's something like sakon's gatling punch, you just practically administered your own end there.
3rd skill no cooldown and single cost for ending alall skills seems too much as it is. But instead he added in 20 piercing damagenand slight flow with the fourth skill even though ending an enemy's skill ruins the effect of the fourth skskill.
I wouldn't spend that energy on the 4th skill for that DD
Nuf said.

FOOOUUURUURRRRRRRRR! (i can only count to four)
Your characters are always like a mmirror concept where one side does one thing and the other side does something similar to contrast it.
I really love this style of character making of yours.
However this one isn't on par compared to many of your others.
The forst and tthird akill are fine.
I mainly have a problem with the 2nd skill.
If can deal 25 damage and ig ore defences for a single specific.
If you can use 1st skill, then third skill, then 3rd skill, then the fourth oon a row, you're set.
I just think this one lacks in the originality department, and it goes a bit off topic with some of its effects.

Character number three does not get my consideration but it was hard deciding between the other three.
2nd character gets my vote though because it has the most spspot-on concept and its balance is perfect compared to the otother 2.
  Posted on March 30, 2013 09:38
Rank: member

Forum Rank:

Posts: 6406
Joined on:
June 12, 2008
1st char - Fine, good DD and moderated damage, balance is perfect. Idea is basic, but good. All in all a good basic character which if in-game could become quite a problem to face. (I would make the 3rd skills damage destroy DD or something like ignoring it)

2nd char - Um, ok, he is dependant on his meteor marks, since without them he is fucked (unless i misunderstood something). But lets say you pulled off the 1st skill. The flow is really great, the damage is exactly how it should be, the Dr would be a bit too much (in my opinon).

3rd char - idk what ta say, basic character made based upon in-game chars. The 1st was fine, too bad he does not benefit more from it. 2nd skill was ok with idea but bad with balance (one less cd or remove that random cost), 3rd is tad op with its effect, the 4th is up ( I would never spend the magic for it). It could have costed only 1 speficic.

4h char - It feels like this char was made just to be made, with no real idea behind it. Though, yes it is a good char, but that good as i am used to. I have to say he is good versatile char, with both good attack and defense, not to mention the flow, but as I told i feel like he is mission something.

All in all - it was between 2nd and 4th char for me. In the end I will give it to 4th, though i felt like he is missing something, he is more usable than Jellal. Lower costs, not that dependant on 1 skill (in fact the more are active, the stronger he gets), so with this being said Gaara gets my vote.

Sorry for grammar mistakes, I am typing it on my phone.
|| Sig by Niki & Ava by Zal || We will stand on principle or we will not stand at all ||
  Posted on March 30, 2013 17:05
Rank: member

Forum Rank:
Special Jounin

Posts: 525
Joined on:
December 27, 2012
Voting Closed, Character #2 and 4 both advance
  Posted on March 30, 2013 17:14
Rank: member

Forum Rank:

Posts: 4231
Joined on:
February 12, 2013
too late lol
sign me the FUCK up good meme go౦ԁ meme thats ✔ some goodmeme rightth ere right✔there ✔✔if i do ƽaү so my self 💯 i say so 💯 thats what im talking about right there right there (chorus: ʳᶦᵍʰᵗ ᵗʰᵉʳᵉ) mMMMMᎷМ💯 НO0ОଠOOOOOОଠଠOoooᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒ 💯 Good meme
  Posted on March 30, 2013 17:16
Rank: member

Forum Rank:

Posts: 1762
Joined on:
June 13, 2009
Well Lux I didn't know you were still cncing It woulda made my life easier but I already past both entries.

However since you cnced both you can just copy and paste it into the semi's area. Sorry about that

Edit: LOL! you didn't have to delete it! I hope you saved it so you can post it in the semi's since 2 character you cnced are there

  Posted on March 30, 2013 17:17
Rank: member

Forum Rank:

Posts: 7008
Joined on:
April 14, 2008
stormyskills wrote:
Well Lux I didn't know you were still cncing It woulda made my life easier but I already past both entries.

However since you cnced both you can just copy and paste it into the semi's area. Sorry about that

Edit: LOL! you didn't have to delete it! I hope you saved it so you can post it in the semi's since 2 character you cnced are there
I saved it, don't worry. But like I said, you do what you have to do, I have no intention of delaying you.
The N-A community in a nutshell:
2010: Luapman sucks! He only does character submissions 'cuz he's too lazy to do them himself! He nerfs everybody! We need a new admin!
2013: Oreacharound sucks! He never does character submissions, and his characters are awful! He won't rework anybody! He nerfs all the metas! Bring back Luapman, he never nerfed anybody!
2015: SiB and Kostas suck! They're reworking all the characters! Bring back Oreacharound, his characters were amazing!

PM Fennekin for a fuck to give.