The 3rd Altar - Page 2

I love Itachi's nerf. Now I don't have to worry about him. Although I dispise the fact that he now is so much weaker than he used to be, and is, once again, a character ruined by Team 7, I hope his numbers stabilize. I think this might be too much of a nerf though, seeing as if you stun him halfway through Ameterasu it automatically stops anyhow. I'll wait for the numbers till I make MY final decision, but if it does turn out it was a bit much, I'd like to re-bring up the 25 undefendable a turn alternative.

To me i think Itachi's chakra usage should be changed. Instead of liek 2 of one chakra maybe make it one of the chakra and one random. For examppe amaretsu requires like 2 nin for 30 damage aoe? thats much like tenten but she can do 30 aoe with one tai one random. Why cant itachi?

As long as you have a stun, Itachi's completely useless now. o_o
I stil think that when compared to most other Genjutsu based moves Itachi's Tsukyomi is incredibly weak.
50 undefendable for 2 gen, but requires prep.
Vs Kurenai and Ino's 25 damage over 4 rounds, no prep, and the stun last longer.

Yes but its 2 Nin for 30 Dmg over two rounds undefendable

But 2 Nin + Random could mabey leave them unable to defend fron one round anyways

Gaara Rehab has a 2 Nin + 1 Random for a 15 with a stun

Well: The opinion was blown to shit, Lol..Nerfed to 30 dmg over two round with no defend

umm, he's still 60 over 2, just not undefendable, why do people keep getting that mixed up?

OOHHHHH its undefendable... my bad i haven't unlocked Itachi YET. yeah also Maybe you should mangekyou sharingan have another effect. Otherwise it is just like normal sharingan, and nothing is special about it. Like maybe when you use Mangekyou sharingan gives more reduction but make itachi lose some health for every move he does like in the series.

Well i meant without the Not able to defend part

Well i meant without the Not able to defend part

Laup i don't agree that you shouldve removed itachis peirce, i still say reducing the damage to 25 both turns, and making the mangkyo reduce 33% or 25% damage was a better idea

~Sorry about this~

Blargh, double negatives T_T

In the end we still need to see if the numbers stack up or not. Remember how many people jumped out of their seats at the Tayuya nerf? That's old news now, so I think this might fall into the same category if it isn't an actual problem backed by numbers.

Um... it's 2 gen for them to STUN. Then it's a random a turn for both of them to deal 25 a turn, that's if they aren't stunned during it. Itachi deals the same damage to stun ratio for a cheaper cost, all in one turn I might add.

Itachi is just as powerful as before, just be more intellectual with how you use him.